Schedule a Consultation: (973) 274-5200
Social Accounts Sprite

Judgements of Divorce Incorporating Settlement Agreements are "Final"

By Snyder Sarno D'Aniello Maceri & da Costa LLC on June 30, 2017


In Abed v. Farag the parties were married for seven years with two children before the wife (“Plaintiff”) filed for divorce.  The parties entered an oral settlement on record which was incorporated into their Final Judgement of Divorce (“JOD”), which provides in part that the parties’ would pay for their children’s college educations with $150,000 from Plaintiff’s bank account.    

The husband (“Defendant”) subsequently filed for reconsideration after learning that Plaintiff allegedly misrepresented an inheritance fund left by Defendant’s mother for the children’s college education.  Defendant also sought enforcement of a prior pendente lite order regarding distribution of the parties’ Mercedes and personal items.  Lastly, Defendant requested a paternity test.  The trial judge denied Defendant’s motion in its entirety.

The court ultimately did not reconsider the parties’ oral settlement that was later consented to in writing.  It found that Defendant did not justify the court vacating portions of the parties’ JOD as to the children’s college account because he did not provide any proof of his assertions. 

As to Defendant’s argument that Plaintiff should reimburse him fifty percent the value of the Mercedes based on a previous pendente lite order, the judge found that the JOD explicitly terminated all pendente lite obligations that were not expressly preserved in it.  The judge found for Plaintiff on his entire motion, including the Mercedes, because his requests were not stipulated and agreed to in their JOD. 

On Defendant’s appeal of the JOD, the Appellate Court affirmed the trial court, holding that a court must enforce a matrimonial agreement as the parties intended unless it would be inequitable to do so.  The Court further noted that it would only have overturned the lower court had their decision been based upon a “palpably incorrect or irrational basis,” failing to consider the probative evidence.         

If you have any questions regarding a Judgment of Divorce, contact the skilled matrimonial attorneys at Snyder Sarno D’Aniello Maceri & da Costa LLCCall us today at (973) 274-5200.            

Related to This

Message Us

"I was involved in a VERY complicated and tumultuous child custody, divorce, domestic violence case for two full years. I was fortunate enough to be represented by one of the top matrimonial teams in the state of NJ, and the outcome in my case exceeded my every expectation." - Former Client

"Paul personally stood by my side and represented me throughout my injury case. Whether it was business at hand, advice, or a late night phone call to help me understand what was going on; he never took a step back towards helping me. I knew that I could call on him at any time . My case was very successful and I attribute that to Paul's dedication . He even came to me during a snow storm when I could not make it to his office. I certainly would recommend him to anyone." - Former Client

X CLOSE

Bergen County Office

401 Hackensack Ave
Ste 706
Hackensack, NJ 07601

Open Today 8:30am - 5:30pm

Essex County Office

425 Eagle Rock Ave
Ste 202
Roseland, NJ 07068

Open Today 8:30am - 5:30pm

Somerset County Office

440 Route 22 E
Ste 170
Bridgewater, NJ 08807

Open Today 8:30am - 5:30pm

X CLOSE

Message Us

X CLOSE

X CLOSE

Popular Tags