Dad Who Racked up Child Support Over Payments Allowed to Pay Less until His Credit is Depleted
By Snyder & Sarno on December 31, 2015
Among many issues brought to the court’s attention after a couple’s 2008 divorce was the father’s child support obligation. But unlike many other former couples’ child support issues, this one in Mistretta v. Mistretta involved a $6,384 over payment by the father.
In 2013, the parties entered into a consent order that permitted the Middlesex County probation department to audit the child support account. The parties each provided “proof of payments made and received.” The probation department’s decision regarding child support would be final.
After the probation department found that there was a surplus of more than $6,000 in the child support account, the husband filed a motion to suspend his child support obligation altogether until there was no money left in the account. The wife did not want his motion granted.
The trial judge did not fully grant the husband’s request, but he compromised to grant it in part. Since the parties’ consent order did not provide for such a situation as the one at hand, the judge decided that the husband could reduce his weekly child support payments from $152 to $75 for 85 weeks. For the 86th week, the husband would pay $143. After that, his $152 weekly obligation would resume.
When the court denied the wife’s motion for reconsideration, she appealed the decision. The New Jersey Appellate Division affirmed the trial judge’s ruling. The trial judge’s decision was not “clearly mistaken” or “wide of the mark,” as necessary under precedent in order for the appellate court to overrule a lower court. Accordingly, the husband’s temporarily reduced child support obligation took effect.
If you have an issue with child support, contact the skilled matrimonial attorneys at Snyder & Sarno, LLC. The attorneys at Snyder & Sarno are experienced in handling cases where the parties share children. Call us today at (973) 274-5200.
Related to This
"I was involved in a VERY complicated and tumultuous child custody, divorce, domestic violence case for two full years. I was fortunate enough to be represented by one of the top matrimonial teams in the state of NJ, and the outcome in my case exceeded my every expectation." - Former Client"Paul personally stood by my side and represented me throughout my injury case. Whether it was business at hand, advice, or a late night phone call to help me understand what was going on; he never took a step back towards helping me. I knew that I could call on him at any time . My case was very successful and I attribute that to Paul's dedication . He even came to me during a snow storm when I could not make it to his office. I certainly would recommend him to anyone." - Former Client