Social Accounts Sprite

If a Judge Can’t Be Impartial, He Probably Shouldn’t Decide the Case

By Snyder & Sarno on June 22, 2015


If a judge has some association with the attorneys or their clients in his courtroom, it may create a conflict of interest.  In the event of a potential conflict, the judge should probably recuse himself from the case, since he might not be able to stay impartial.  If he doesn’t, the disadvantaged party will not be too happy, and they will likely appeal the judge’s unfavorable decisions.

This week, the New Jersey Appellate Division heard the case of P.M. v. N.P.  The parties in this case had been involved in numerous contentious post-divorce motions, during which time the judge’s clerk discussed and ultimately accepted an employment opportunity with the attorney representing the defendant ex-husband.  In addition, the ex-wife alleged that the judge was somehow related to the law clerk.  The combination of these situations, she claimed, created a conflict of interest that affected the judge’s ability to remain impartial. 

The ex-wife filed an application asking the judge to recuse himself, but the judge denied her application.  She also argued that the judge erred when he denied her request to vacate the orders that he entered during the time when his clerk was discussing employment with defense counsel and after the clerk began working for defense counsel. 

The Appellate Court vacated the order denying the ex-wife’s request that the judge recuse himself.  The Court sent the case back down to the judge to make a few specific findings, including (1) the judge’s family relationship to his former clerk, (2) the timeframe of the clerk’s employment talks with the ex-husband’s lawyer, and (3) the specific time that the ex-husband’s lawyer offered the clerk a job.  After that, the judge must determine the extent to which the clerk’s employment involvement with defense counsel impacted his appearance of impropriety, requiring his recusal, under the standards set by the Supreme Court in In re Reddin, DeNike v. Cupo, and Rule 1:12-2

If you are currently going through a divorce, or have an issue with any post-divorce matters, contact the skilled matrimonial attorneys at Snyder & Sarno, LLCCall us today at (973) 274-5200. 

Related to This

desktop-only

Message Us

"I was involved in a VERY complicated and tumultuous child custody, divorce, domestic violence case for two full years. I was fortunate enough to be represented by one of the top matrimonial teams in the state of NJ, and the outcome in my case exceeded my every expectation." - Former Client

"Paul personally stood by my side and represented me throughout my injury case. Whether it was business at hand, advice, or a late night phone call to help me understand what was going on; he never took a step back towards helping me. I knew that I could call on him at any time . My case was very successful and I attribute that to Paul's dedication . He even came to me during a snow storm when I could not make it to his office. I certainly would recommend him to anyone." - Former Client

X CLOSE

Bergen County Office

401 Hackensack Ave
Ste 706
Hackensack, NJ 07601

Open Today 8:30am - 5:30pm

Essex County Office

425 Eagle Rock Ave
Ste 202
Roseland, NJ 07068

Open Today 8:30am - 5:30pm

Somerset County Office

440 Route 22 E
Ste 170
Bridgewater, NJ 08807

Open Today 8:30am - 5:30pm

X CLOSE

Message Us

X CLOSE

X CLOSE

Popular Tags