Social Accounts Sprite

Parties Bound By Settlement Agreement Despite FRO

By Snyder & Sarno on January 07, 2015


In many cases, parties who divorce or end their relationship are happy to come to an agreement settling their differences, which often means less cost and less contention.  There are, however, some instances where after an agreement is entered, one of the parties no longer wants to be bound by it.  This was the case in the recent Appellate Division case of R.R. v. R.N.

In R.R. v. R.N., the parties entered into a Domestic Partnership in 2005, but ended their relationship in 2011.  At that time, they signed a Property Settlement Agreement stating that the plaintiff would own two-thirds and the defendant would own one-third of their home in Ocean Grove, NJ.  The defendant would also have the right to live in the house for 10 years, after which either party could buy out the other’s share or sell the property.

Shortly thereafter, the plaintiff obtained a Final Restraining Order against the defendant due to the defendant’s stalking and harassment of the plaintiff.  As a result, the plaintiff sought a forced partition of the Ocean Grove property prior to the end of the 10-year period.  The trial court denied the plaintiff’s request and enforced the terms of the Property Settlement Agreement. 

On appeal, the New Jersey Appellate Division stated that settlement agreements will not be set aside unless they are fraudulent or unconscionable, which the plaintiff failed to show in this case.  In addition, the Appellate Division said that even though there was a restraining order in place involving the parties, the order would not necessarily limit the defendant’s rights to the property. 

The Appellate Division cited the case of Michalski v. Michalski, 50 N.J. Super. 454 (App. Div. 1958) for the proposition that a court could modify an agreement to force partition of a home, but this would only be done if there were extenuating circumstances.  In this case, however, the court decided that while the restraining order would make communications about the property more difficult, there were no extenuating circumstances that “destroy the intent of the parties” in forming the agreement.

If you are going through a divorce and settlement is a possibility, call the skilled attorneys at Snyder & Sarno, LLC to help ensure that your rights are protected in any agreement you enter into.  Call us today at (973) 274-5200.    

Related to This

desktop-only

Message Us

"I was involved in a VERY complicated and tumultuous child custody, divorce, domestic violence case for two full years. I was fortunate enough to be represented by one of the top matrimonial teams in the state of NJ, and the outcome in my case exceeded my every expectation." - Former Client

"Paul personally stood by my side and represented me throughout my injury case. Whether it was business at hand, advice, or a late night phone call to help me understand what was going on; he never took a step back towards helping me. I knew that I could call on him at any time . My case was very successful and I attribute that to Paul's dedication . He even came to me during a snow storm when I could not make it to his office. I certainly would recommend him to anyone." - Former Client

X CLOSE

Bergen County Office

401 Hackensack Ave
Ste 706
Hackensack, NJ 07601

Open Today 8:30am - 5:30pm

Essex County Office

425 Eagle Rock Ave
Ste 202
Roseland, NJ 07068

Open Today 8:30am - 5:30pm

Somerset County Office

440 Route 22 E
Ste 170
Bridgewater, NJ 08807

Open Today 8:30am - 5:30pm

X CLOSE

Message Us

X CLOSE

X CLOSE

Popular Tags