Will My Child Have to Speak With the Judge in My Custody Battle?
By Snyder & Sarno on November 11, 2014
In child custody cases, the decision whether or not to have the judge speak with the children in an in camera or private interview is often based on various considerations. For instance, the age, maturity, and emotional state of the child are often taken into consideration when deciding whether or not to request such an interview. Under New Jersey Rule 5:8-6, a party may request that the judge speak with the child, or the court may decide to do so on its own. This request must be made before any trial. The Rule states that if the judge decides not to interview the child, his/her reasons shall be placed on the record. In addition, the interview will be placed on the record, which will be made available to both parties for a fee, but, unless the court approves such communication, both parties are prohibited from discussing the contents of the interview with the child.
In the recent case of Vocisano v. Reynolds, the father appealed from a trial court order awarding the mother shared legal and physical custody. The father had originally sought sole legal and physical custody. On appeal, one of his arguments was that the trial judge had erred by failing to interview the child at issue.
The Appellate Division stated that, in regards to this issue, there was no evidence that either party had requested for the judge to interview the child. The Appellate Division concluded that without such a request, Rule 5:8-6 “does not require judges to conduct an interview or articulate reasons for not doing so.”
In any custody case, the trial court must keep in mind the “best interests of the child.” Beck v. Beck, 86 N.J. 480 (1981). Under N.J.S.A. 9:2-4, the court may consider the child’s preferences in determining what is in that child’s best interests, assuming the child is of sufficient age and capacity. Thus, deciding whether or not the benefit of a child interview will outweigh any potential harm to the child can be a difficult decision for a parent.
Related to This
"I was involved in a VERY complicated and tumultuous child custody, divorce, domestic violence case for two full years. I was fortunate enough to be represented by one of the top matrimonial teams in the state of NJ, and the outcome in my case exceeded my every expectation." - Former Client"Paul personally stood by my side and represented me throughout my injury case. Whether it was business at hand, advice, or a late night phone call to help me understand what was going on; he never took a step back towards helping me. I knew that I could call on him at any time . My case was very successful and I attribute that to Paul's dedication . He even came to me during a snow storm when I could not make it to his office. I certainly would recommend him to anyone." - Former Client