Responsible Party for Medical Complications Doesn’t Always Pick Up the Tab
By Paul da Costa on November 16, 2015
In the United States, the debate ensues over who is responsible for footing the bill for medical care required as a result of hospital procedures gone wrong, according to The Washington Post. Often, fault for a bad outcome is disputed, and it may never be known if the source was human error or plain old bad luck.
A few gracious hospitals require that a patient be told about a complication as soon as the hospital finds out. In those places, follow-up care is often provided free to any patient who encounters the bad outcome. While it seems that this is an expensive solution for these hospitals, research indicates that a hospital is less likely to be sued by such a patient when honesty is their policy.
Most hospitals, though, do not have such a policy. Several professional and safety groups, such as the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists, the American Medical Association, and the federal Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality, are urging more hospitals to adopt bill-waiving policies for preventable consequences, i.e., “never events.” Patient safety advocates are pushing for the same thing.
In most situations, the burden of paying consequential medical bills falls on the patients themselves or their insurance companies. According to a 2013 article in the Journal of the American Medical Association, a privately insured patient costs almost $40,000 more when complications resulted from surgery than when surgery produced no complications.
America’s Health Insurance Plans, a trade group, feels that patients should not be obligated to pay for something that is not in their control. Clare Krusing, a spokeswoman for the group, talks about a “bundled payment.” When insurance companies add certain hospitals into their policy coverage, they sometimes decide in advance how certain mistakes will be handled. As part of a “bundled payment” plan with insurance companies, a hospital may provide free follow-up care to patients who encounter these errors. But it must be very clear that the complications resulted from an error, rather than a twist of fate. Where there is no “bundled payment” or bill-waiving in place, the patient is stuck with the rest. Krusing implores insurance companies to pick up the tab on the remainder of the medical expenses after a patient covers his deductible.
If you think you may have a medical malpractice claim, contact Paul M. da Costa, Esq. at Snyder & Sarno, LLC. The attorneys at Snyder & Sarno are experienced in handling all kinds of medical malpractice cases. Call us today at (973) 274-5200.
Related to This
"I was involved in a VERY complicated and tumultuous child custody, divorce, domestic violence case for two full years. I was fortunate enough to be represented by one of the top matrimonial teams in the state of NJ, and the outcome in my case exceeded my every expectation." - Former Client"Paul personally stood by my side and represented me throughout my injury case. Whether it was business at hand, advice, or a late night phone call to help me understand what was going on; he never took a step back towards helping me. I knew that I could call on him at any time . My case was very successful and I attribute that to Paul's dedication . He even came to me during a snow storm when I could not make it to his office. I certainly would recommend him to anyone." - Former Client